American Media Suppresses Information

The New York Post published email evidence  presidential candidate Joe Biden lied when he said he’s never spoken to my son about his overseas business dealings. The emails indicate Biden abused his power as vice president when he  pressured government officials in Ukraine into firing a prosecutor who was investigating an energy company called Bursima. Biden's son, Hunter, was on the company's board and being paid $50,000 a month  even though he had no  energy sector experience and doesn’t speak any of the languages spoken in the Ukraine. (Note: Currently Google is blocking direct links to the New York Post article.The title of their story is: Smoking-gun email reveals how Hunter Biden introduced Ukrainian businessman to VP dad ).

 In 2018, Joe Biden bragged to the Council on Foreign Relations about how he got that prosecutor fired. He said: “I looked at them and said: I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money. Well, son of a bitch. He got fired.”

Facebook, Twitter, ABCNews and MSNBC, supressed the New York Post evidence. They were trying to limit the spread of information and shield their political Party from inconvenient questions.  

MSNBC reporter Kyle Griffin stated "No one should link to or share that NY Post 'report'. MSNBC reporter Hallie Jackson labeled the NY Post a source "tabloid" claiming its an unreliable.  ABCnews refused to report the story.  Twitter began blocking users from sharing or sending the New York Post article. They also locked the New York Post's Twitter account.  Facebook announced that it would be “reducing distribution” of the story  on its platform so that it could limit the number of users who could read it.

Facebook and Twitter have special protections that traditional media sites do not. They have the protection of Section 230. That legislation states "No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider."

Section 230 was intended to give everyone an outlet to voice their opinion on a platform that could be easily accessed. Each individual would be responsible for their own views, The community platforms they voiced these views on would not be held liable in a court of law. However, Facebook and Twitter have shown they are not community platforms. Instead, they are platforms promoting far left propaganda. The two organizations regularly suppress information that is damaging to socialism or detrimental to left wing political candidates. Everyone CANNOT voice their opinions on these platforms. Twitter's chief executive, Jack Dorsey, is an admirer of the Soviet system of censorship.

Section 230 should be revoked for both Facebook and Twitter. The legislation should not apply to them.  They are run similar to ABCNews or MSNBCnews  promoting specific political agenda. Therefore,  Facebook and Twitter should be held responsible for what they broadcast.

The American media suppresses information based on its political agenda.  They act totalitarian. They behave similar to tyrant governments in China, Cuba Venezuela and the old Soviet Union.